I had a family member do something really bad a few years back, because I was so closely involved, I reacted and spoke with people regarding the situation.
In essence, I spoke with a bunch of family members about what happened. I was upset and in an effort to regain my balance, I blabbed. The family member who committed the act was upset and close family members took sides.
You would think that the line drawn and the sides taken were related to the act or offense, but this was not the case. The debate became about whether or not this family member had a right to not tell anyone what he did.
My contention is; if he knew, ahead of time that the offensive act would have been displayed globally in the main stream media, that he would not have committed the act in the first place.
As a matter of contention, if every mind and body had to present every thought or action as public record, we would destroy 90% +/- of all society ill’s.
The only problem with this method of revival is it would need to be adopted by every mind and body on the planet, as a tool to moderate behavior.
We certainly could not have the masses bound by full disclosure, while allowing the powerful amnesty from process, for this would only lead to more slavery and separation between the classes.
All I know is that if people had to do disclose all thought and action, we would rarely commit offense.
This branches into a free will and rights to privacy debate, but there are two-way to get where we need to be. One is we are forced to change. In this case, we will perceive our free will and rights to have been stolen. The second is to come together as one mind and body and evolve of our volition.
One attacks our free will and privacy and one defends it, but which one does which?
What I am promoting is not a loss of free will, but a willing modification to our perception of free will and the destruction of the ability to act or think of acting without every mind and body knowing about it.
It is just like my drinking. When I was struggling with my right to drink, I could not stop drinking, because I was perceiving it as a loss of free will and a privacy issue (“I should be able to do what I want to do”).
Now that I have been sober for years, I have come to realize; I was not robbed of my free will, but chose to change what it was that I wanted. When I did not want to drink anymore, this became my free will and I do not lose any privacy, because I can just as easily not drink in private as I can, drink in private.
Does this make sense?
It was not a loss of free will, but a realignment of my power.
It could be the same for all of us, as one body, if we came together to attack the core issue, relating to our presence; which is a misuse of free will, a lack of understanding relating to privacy and our perception of ownership, in which we own, all of what is going on around us, but very little of what we are doing and thinking.
In my most basic contention; I contend that every mind and body on this planet can have access to my every thought and action, as long as I am allowed the same privilege, and it is a privilege.
This means; if President Obama wants to know what I am thinking and doing, in complete and open fashion, then I too, should know exactly what he is doing and thinking (not what he is telling me, he is doing and thinking, but the truth and why).
If that were the case, then I would be fine with complete disclosure; knowing that it was initiated through a massive act of free will and not a loss of the same.
This will take place eventually and is a part of our evolutionary process. As long as there is enough time. We do not have forever, because like in other races that have walked this planet. we have become hazardous and threatening to our universal neighbors.
If we cannot prove an active “LIFE”, through an evolutionary expression, then we cannot stay on, as is.
You would think that a method like this would be, endlessly unpleasant, but this is not true. Initially it would be a fiasco, but only until the evolution of thoughts and actions came to bear new fruit.
We would stop doing fucked up thinks and then later, would eventually stop think of fucked up things to do.
You know what it comes down to? I do not want any body, liking or disliking me, without knowing me and I do not want to like or not like someone, without knowing them.
I certainly do not want to put any body on a pedestal, not having a true understanding of what they are doing and what they are thinking.